CDSJ projects · Lesotho

Where public purpose becomes practical action.

Our projects connect community realities, technical evidence and institutional partnership—responding to immediate needs while building the pathways and systems that can make change last.

6Public project stories
3Active or entering delivery
6Connected programme pillars
Community-rooted◆Evidence-led◆Rights-based◆Locally led◆Systems-focused◆Learning-oriented◆Community-rooted◆Evidence-led◆Rights-based◆Locally led◆Systems-focused◆Learning-oriented◆
Our implementation philosophy

A project should leave more than a completed activity.

CDSJ designs projects around the whole pathway of change: what people experience, what communities can organise, how frontline practice responds, which institutions must improve and what evidence can carry learning into policy or wider practice.

Some initiatives begin with direct support. Others begin with research, civic participation or institutional dialogue. Across the portfolio, the aim is the same—to produce practical public value while building local capability, accountability and knowledge that can endure.

01

Start with lived reality

Listen, map barriers and recognise the strengths, relationships and risks already present in communities.

02

Connect the system

Bring communities, practitioners and institutions into a clear implementation and accountability pathway.

03

Learn for wider change

Document honestly, adapt delivery and turn grounded evidence into stronger decisions and future models.

01 · Digital civic participationApproved · inception phase

CivicConnect Lesotho: A Digital Civic Accountability and Participation Platform

An approved nine-month Digital Action Lab Cohort 3 pilot to develop and test a safe, mobile-friendly pathway through which underserved communities can document governance concerns, follow referrals and turn experience into evidence for public accountability.

Nine-month pilot · National and selected pilot communities, Lesotho
GovernanceHuman RightsCivic TechnologyAccess to Justice
Read the project story ↓
9 monthsPlanned pilot
600Planned rural participants
150Community focal persons and civic actors
5,000–7,500Planned indirect reach
The story and the strategy

When a public concern disappears, trust disappears with it.

People in rural and underserved communities often have no safe, trusted and consistent way to record concerns about public services, corruption, abuse of power, discrimination, exclusion, access to justice or restrictions on civic space. Concerns raised verbally or on paper can disappear between institutions, leaving people without a clear record, a referral pathway or a way to know whether action was taken.

CivicConnect is designed to strengthen the response loop. It will combine an accessible digital intake pathway with trusted community focal persons, referral tracking and anonymised evidence—not simply to collect reports, but to help communities participate safely and institutions see patterns requiring attention.

Safe civic participation needs more than a reporting button. It needs consent, trusted relationships, clear referrals and honest follow-through.
01

Accessible intake

A low-data, mobile-friendly tool with simple-language and English or Sesotho options for recording the concern, location, urgency, consent and referral need.

02

Visible follow-up

A structured workflow distinguishing documentation, referral, institutional response, unresolved matters and safe escalation.

03

Protected evidence

An anonymised dashboard that can reveal patterns without exposing identities and support constructive, non-partisan accountability dialogue.

Explore the complete project brief+
Implementation

From co-design to a tested accountability pathway

Months 1–3 will focus on baseline work, community and institutional mapping, user consultation, safe referral protocols, platform design and the data workflow. Months 3–7 will cover development, testing, training and pilot rollout with community focal persons and grassroots civic actors.

Months 8–9 will translate anonymised patterns into evidence briefs and accountability dialogue. Evaluation and learning will guide recommendations for continuation and responsible scale-up. Planned direct reach includes 600 rural community members; inclusion groups may overlap and are not separate totals.

Progress and contribution

What the pilot is expected to produce

  • ✓A working mobile-friendly platform and safe issue-recording workflow
  • ✓A referral and follow-up tracker
  • ✓Trained community focal persons and grassroots civic actors
  • ✓Consent, digital-safety and data-protection tools
  • ✓An anonymised civic-issues database and evidence briefs
  • ✓A learning report with recommendations for responsible adaptation and scale
Safeguarding, ethics and accountability

The project will apply informed consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, restricted disclosure and role-based access. Sensitive information will be stored securely, and no identifying case detail will enter public briefs unless it has been anonymised and is safe to use. CivicConnect will not promise that every concern can be solved; it will distinguish clearly between documentation, referral, institutional response and resolution.

WHY THIS MATTERS TO PARTNERS

A grounded bridge between civic technology and institutional accountability

The project brings together digital inclusion, community trust, human-rights safeguards and usable evidence. It offers a practical learning platform for partners interested in locally led governance, civic space, disability and gender inclusion, responsible data practice and public-institution responsiveness.

Discuss this project →

Publication note: This brief presents the approved concept, intended approach and planned reach. Confirmed calendar dates, partnerships and implementation milestones will be added as delivery progresses. The backup copy of the online application is not published.

02 · Gender-just criminal justiceOngoing

Fairer Justice for Women and Girls in Lesotho

A CDSJ-led reform initiative addressing gaps in the justice response to technology-facilitated gender-based violence and the unequal criminalisation of women and girls in pregnancy- and child-related cases.

2026–ongoing · National, Lesotho
Gender EqualityAccess to JusticeHuman RightsLegal Reform
Read the project story ↓
Stakeholders at a CDSJ gender-just criminal justice planning meeting
Justice-sector, gender and civil-society stakeholders developing a shared implementation pathway with CDSJ.
3Reform workstreams
6Case reviews planned
1Strategic case support planned
2Radio discussions planned
The story and the strategy

The law can exist—and still leave women and girls without fair treatment.

Abuse through phones, social media and other digital platforms can cause serious harm, yet justice actors do not always have clear and consistent rules for recording, investigating and presenting these cases. A second concern arises when girls and young women are charged alone in pregnancy, abortion, infant-abandonment or child-neglect matters even where responsibility may be shared by men or other actors.

CDSJ is moving these concerns from private experience into structured reform. The project combines legal and case analysis, stakeholder planning, public communication, institutional engagement and strategic support so that evidence can shape rules, decisions and frontline practice.

The objective is not only a better policy. It is a fairer journey through police, prosecution, courts, protection and public understanding.
01

Clear rules for digital abuse

Focused discussion and case review will inform legal rules and practical guidance for investigating and prosecuting technology-facilitated GBV.

02

Fairer criminal liability

Evidence from pregnancy- and child-related cases will support reform analysis and engagement with parliamentary and justice actors.

03

A real case for wider change

Strategic case support, civil-society coordination and public dialogue will connect individual justice with structural reform.

Explore the complete project brief+
Implementation

Linking evidence, practice and public dialogue

The initiative is organised through three connected workstreams: technology-facilitated GBV prosecution, gendered criminal liability in pregnancy- and child-related cases, and strategic case support linked to wider reform.

Implementation combines legal research, six planned case reviews, practical police and prosecution guidance, parliamentary and justice-sector engagement, a deserving case for support, civil-society action planning and accessible public communication.

Progress and contribution

Progress already visible

  • ✓CDSJ convened an implementation planning meeting on 26 August 2026
  • ✓A Mohale FM interview introduced both justice issues to a wider public audience
  • ✓The concerns have entered national GBV coordination and justice-sector dialogue
  • ✓Two focused public-interest legal briefs have been published
  • ✓A public guide connects the reform issues to accessible legal understanding
  • ✓Stakeholder roles and institutional pathways are being developed
Safeguarding, ethics and accountability

Participation is voluntary and based on informed consent. Identifying details are protected, information is stored carefully, and the legal interests and wishes of affected people come first. Public communication focuses on structural lessons rather than exposing individual survivors or cases. The project’s funding-source details remain confidential and are not published.

WHY THIS MATTERS TO PARTNERS

A practical route from community experience to institutional change

Partners can contribute to legal analysis, survivor-centred practice, digital safety, strategic litigation, implementation learning and sustained reform engagement across police, prosecution, Parliament and civil society.

Discuss this project →

Confidentiality note: donor and funding-source details for this initiative are intentionally not disclosed on the public website.

03 · Child protection and resilient livelihoodsOngoing

Child Protection, GBV Prevention and SILC Support for Child-Headed Households

A self-funded initiative supporting 32 child-headed households across six rural communities through household profiling, protection and legal referrals, school retention and SILC-based economic strengthening.

Started April 2025 · Six rural communities, including Ha Mafa, Mafeteng
Child ProtectionGBV PreventionSILCLivelihoods
Read the project story ↓
CDSJ child-protection and SILC project engagement
CDSJ’s field practice connects household protection, rights, education and resilient livelihoods.
32Households identified
6Rural communities
M20,000Livelihood investment
Self-fundedFunding modality
The story and the strategy

A household cannot be protected one risk at a time.

Child-headed households can face food insecurity, school interruption, exposure to GBV, property grabbing, forced servitude, early marriage and weak access to services at the same time. An income activity alone cannot resolve a protection case; a referral alone cannot secure a household’s future.

CDSJ therefore designed a combined community response. Household profiling and follow-up connect child protection, GBV prevention, legal support, school retention, savings and livelihood development around each household’s actual conditions.

Economic vulnerability and rights vulnerability are connected. A credible response must be equally connected.
01

Protection and referral

Field visits, vulnerability assessment, protection awareness and practical follow-up connect households to appropriate services and support.

02

Savings and livelihoods

SILC groups build peer connection, household resilience and preparation for sustainable, locally viable income activity.

03

Rights and education

Legal and education pathways address inheritance, property, documentation, service access and school retention or re-entry.

Explore the complete project brief+
Implementation

A whole-household, community-based model

The project identifies and profiles child-headed households based on actual conditions, then combines prevention, referral and practical household-strengthening support. Older adolescents are supported toward livelihoods and cooperative approaches while legal and protection concerns receive follow-up.

At Ha Mafa, CDSJ invested M20,000 directly in a SILC-linked onion and potato farming initiative intended for commercial-scale production connected to local street-vending markets—showing how savings groups can progress toward structured livelihood activity.

Progress and contribution

What implementation is building

  • ✓Thirty-two child-headed households identified across six rural communities
  • ✓Household profiling and vulnerability assessment linked to follow-up
  • ✓GBV prevention and child-protection awareness integrated into field engagement
  • ✓SILC-based economic strengthening and peer support underway
  • ✓Direct livelihood investment at Ha Mafa
  • ✓Legal, inheritance, documentation and school-retention pathways incorporated
Safeguarding, ethics and accountability

Work involving children and vulnerable households requires careful consent, confidentiality, referral judgement and do-no-harm practice. Public stories avoid identifying children or disclosing details that could expose household location, legal concerns or protection status.

WHY THIS MATTERS TO PARTNERS

A grounded model for integrated rural household support

The initiative offers partners a practical foundation for combining child protection, legal empowerment, education continuity, savings and climate-aware livelihoods rather than funding fragmented responses to interconnected risks.

Discuss this project →

Implementation figures describe verified households, communities and investment to date. Future reach and outcome claims will be added only when documented.

04 · Youth voice and gender justiceCompleted

CSW70 National Youth Consultation on Access to Justice for Women and Girls in Lesotho

A self-funded national consultation that brought together 30 participants to develop youth recommendations for the UN Women CSW70 global process while generating grounded evidence for justice reform in Lesotho.

16 December 2025 · UN House, Maseru, Lesotho
Access to JusticeGender EqualityYouth EngagementCSW70
Read the project story ↓
Participants in the CSW70 National Youth Consultation
Young people and allies developing recommendations on access to justice for women and girls.
30Participants
5Thematic groups
3Key recommendations
Self-fundedFunding modality
The story and the strategy

Global advocacy is stronger when local voices shape the agenda.

Women and girls in Lesotho continue to encounter barriers to justice in cases involving GBV, sexual abuse, economic exploitation and harmful social norms. These barriers are intensified by under-resourced institutions, limited rural legal aid, weak digital access and justice processes that may not be designed around adolescent or survivor needs.

CDSJ convened the consultation so adolescent girls, young women, youth representatives, women’s-rights allies and civil-society actors could analyse those barriers and carry locally grounded recommendations into the CSW70 global process.

Youth participation was treated as a source of legal and policy insight—not as a ceremonial presence.
01

Listen across difference

Participants from urban, peri-urban and rural contexts worked through five thematic groups and plenary validation.

02

Name structural barriers

The consultation examined consent, school responses, economic rights, institutional capacity, rural legal aid, digital exclusion and disability access.

03

Move voice into advocacy

Rapporteur documentation and collective validation turned discussion into a clear set of recommendations for national and global engagement.

Explore the complete project brief+
Implementation

A focused participatory consultation with policy purpose

The one-day process combined plenary framing, five facilitated thematic groups, rapporteur documentation and collective validation. The method created room for lived experience, legal concerns and practical institutional recommendations to be examined together.

Key issues included guardian-consent barriers, school responses that mischaracterise rape, enforcement of marital-property and economic rights, police and court capacity, shelters and rural legal aid, digital exclusion and inaccessible justice infrastructure.

Progress and contribution

Three recommendations emerging from the process

  • ✓Reform and enforce laws and policies guaranteeing independent access to justice
  • ✓Strengthen justice institutions to deliver survivor-centred, accessible and accountable services
  • ✓Invest in legal empowerment, digital inclusion and disability-accessible justice systems
  • ✓Generated youth-informed evidence for national legal-empowerment work
  • ✓Demonstrated CDSJ’s capacity to independently design and coordinate a national consultation
  • ✓Expanded the organisation’s evidence-driven gender-justice portfolio
Safeguarding, ethics and accountability

Participation and documentation were handled with attention to dignity, age, gender and the sensitivity of discussions about violence and justice. The public story communicates structural issues and collective recommendations rather than exposing personal experiences.

WHY THIS MATTERS TO PARTNERS

A tested model for meaningful youth participation in policy processes

The consultation demonstrates CDSJ’s ability to translate an international policy moment into a credible national process—combining mobilisation, facilitation, documentation and advocacy around a clear public-interest question.

Discuss this project →

All participation and recommendation figures reflect the completed consultation. The project was self-funded by CDSJ.

05 · Youth resilience and community safetyCompleted

Hope Over Hustle: Youth and Community Resilience to Famo-Linked Organised Crime

A founder-led resilience initiative that worked with young people, families, community leaders and public institutions to reduce vulnerability to gang recruitment and strengthen safer, locally owned alternatives.

August 2024–July 2025 · Matelile and Ha Mafa, Mafeteng
Youth LeadershipChild ProtectionCommunity SafetyViolence Prevention
Read the project story ↓
Stakeholders in a Hope Over Hustle community-safety learning session
Community and institutional actors reflecting on locally owned approaches to youth safety and resilience.
75Youth in civic training
20Mentorship pairs
3Radio programmes
18Youth prepared for BootCamp
The story and the strategy

Young people need credible alternatives before harmful networks offer their own.

Violence associated with famo-linked organised crime has affected safety, family life and opportunity in parts of Lesotho. Young men and boys can face recruitment, coercion, retaliation and promises of protection or income. Enforcement alone cannot address the trauma, social pressure and lack of positive pathways that make recruitment possible.

Hope Over Hustle placed prevention, dignity and community ownership at the centre. It connected civic-leadership training, peer mentorship, community service, protective relationships and cooperation with public institutions so young people could experience safer forms of belonging and purpose.

Prevention became strongest where trust, mentorship, community leadership and institutional responsibility met.
01

Youth agency

Civic-leadership sessions and community-service projects positioned young people as contributors rather than risks to be managed.

02

Trusted relationships

Mentor–mentee pairs, chiefs, schools and families created discreet support and stronger reintegration pathways.

03

Coordinated prevention

Public institutions and community actors explored protection mechanisms, early intervention and a trauma-informed, non-militarised BootCamp model.

Explore the complete project brief+
Implementation

An adaptive prevention model built around safety and belonging

The initiative combined partnership-building with the LMPS, LDF, chiefs, schools and community leaders; youth-led civic engagement; peer mentorship; community alert mechanisms; public radio discussion; and preparation for a trauma-informed Youth BootCamp and reintegration pathway.

Delivery adapted to local risk. In higher-risk settings, household visits and coded identifiers were safer than public mobilisation. Mentors enabled young people to participate without stigma, while chiefs and schools strengthened community legitimacy and reintegration planning.

Progress and contribution

Documented milestones and learning

  • ✓Fifty-three young people joined the first Matelile dialogue
  • ✓Three civic-leadership sessions reached 75 young people
  • ✓Five youth-led community-service projects were supported
  • ✓Twenty mentor–mentee pairs were established
  • ✓Community workshops reached 60 people and a partnership workshop reached 35
  • ✓Three radio programmes extended public discussion and 18 boys received BootCamp readiness support
Safeguarding, ethics and accountability

The project adapted mobilisation to local risk, used discreet household engagement where necessary and avoided public labelling of young people. The proposed BootCamp model was intentionally trauma-informed and non-militarised, with reintegration and emotional readiness treated as core design concerns.

WHY THIS MATTERS TO PARTNERS

Grounded learning for prevention-led youth and community safety

The initiative provides a credible foundation for future work combining youth leadership, violence prevention, psychosocial support, mentoring and accountable institutional partnership in communities affected by organised violence.

Discuss this project →

Institutional transparency: this initiative was led by CDSJ’s founder through a Resilience Fund Fellowship before CDSJ’s formal registration. Its documented methods, partnerships and learning now inform CDSJ’s programme development.

06 · School-to-community transitionCompleted

Organising Community Service Opportunities for LGCSE-Completing Students

A 2025 youth-leadership initiative designed to help secondary-school graduates use the transition after LGCSE completion for civic learning, community service and early exposure to development pathways.

2025 · Leribe District, Lesotho
Youth DevelopmentGovernanceCivic EngagementEducation Transition
Read the project story ↓
2Participating schools
1District focus
4Delivery components
2025Implementation year
The story and the strategy

The waiting period after school can become a leadership opportunity.

Students completing the Lesotho General Certificate of Secondary Education can face a long interval before university, training or employment. Without structured opportunity, that period can become one of disconnection from learning, community and future pathways.

The initiative reframed transition time as a platform for civic learning, community service and early exposure to development careers. Schools provided an organising base, community problems became practical learning material and mentors connected young people with wider institutions and possibilities.

Citizenship becomes meaningful when young people can practise it through responsibility, service and visible contribution.
01

Leadership formation

Seminars connected personal strengths, responsible citizenship, civic engagement and the practical meaning of public service.

02

Community action

Students diagnosed issues close to home and designed service responses with peers and local institutions.

03

Mentoring and exposure

Civil society, government, health and community actors offered guidance, pathways and supportive supervision.

Explore the complete project brief+
Implementation

A simple model with potential for responsible growth

The design combined leadership seminars, community-problem diagnosis, student-led service projects, mentor mapping, supportive supervision and practical monitoring. The curriculum covered civic engagement, teamwork, mobilisation, service design, resource mobilisation, project management and learning documentation.

The model remains relevant as a school-to-community transition pathway. Schools can provide continuity, mentors can sustain engagement and small service projects can turn civic responsibility from an abstract concept into visible action.

Progress and contribution

What the model was designed to contribute

  • ✓Greater exposure to development, service and leadership pathways
  • ✓Stronger ability to identify and analyse community problems
  • ✓Practical teamwork and community-mobilisation experience
  • ✓Early understanding of resource mobilisation and project management
  • ✓Youth-led service concepts rooted in local priorities
  • ✓A scalable foundation for future school-to-community placements
Safeguarding, ethics and accountability

Future adaptation should apply clear supervision, child- and youth-safeguarding standards, appropriate consent, safe placement criteria and accessible grievance pathways for participants.

WHY THIS MATTERS TO PARTNERS

A practical bridge between education, citizenship and employability

The model can be developed into a structured school-to-community transition programme combining youth leadership, volunteer placements, mentoring and small community-action projects. It offers a partnership opportunity across education, employability and locally led development.

Discuss this project →

Institutional transparency: this founder-led initiative took place before CDSJ’s formal registration. Available source documents describe the model and intended outcomes; this page therefore does not claim unverified participant or impact totals.

Partner with purpose

Bring your mandate. We will bring local leadership, connected thinking and disciplined delivery.

CDSJ welcomes funders, public institutions, research partners, technical specialists and civil-society organisations seeking credible ways to co-design, implement, learn from and responsibly grow people-centred work in Lesotho.